Singer v. KRUL
967 N.E.2d 699, 18 N.Y.3d 953, 944 N.Y.S.2d 474, 2012 NY Slip Op 68604, 2012 WL 1033929, 2012 N.Y. LEXIS 578
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 29, 2012
DocketMotion No: 2012-137
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 967 N.E.2d 699 (Singer v. KRUL) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Singer v. KRUL, 967 N.E.2d 699, 18 N.Y.3d 953, 944 N.Y.S.2d 474, 2012 NY Slip Op 68604, 2012 WL 1033929, 2012 N.Y. LEXIS 578 (N.Y. 2012).
Opinion
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution (see Cuadrado v New York City Tr. Auth., 65 AD3d 434 [2009], Iv dismissed 14 NY3d 748 [2010]).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Matter of Susan D. Settenbrino, Pc v. Barroga-Hayes
967 N.E.2d 699 (New York Court of Appeals, 2012)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
967 N.E.2d 699, 18 N.Y.3d 953, 944 N.Y.S.2d 474, 2012 NY Slip Op 68604, 2012 WL 1033929, 2012 N.Y. LEXIS 578, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/singer-v-krul-ny-2012.