Singer v. KRUL

967 N.E.2d 699, 18 N.Y.3d 953, 944 N.Y.S.2d 474, 2012 NY Slip Op 68604, 2012 WL 1033929, 2012 N.Y. LEXIS 578
New York Court of Appeals·Decided March 29, 2012·No. Motion No: 2012-137·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution (see Cuadrado v New York City Tr. Auth., 65 AD3d 434 [2009], Iv dismissed 14 NY3d 748 [2010]).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Singer v. KRUL, 967 N.E.2d 699, 18 N.Y.3d 953, 944 N.Y.S.2d 474, 2012 NY Slip Op 68604, 2012 WL 1033929, 2012 N.Y. LEXIS 578 (N.Y. 2012).

967 N.E.2d 699 (Singer v. KRUL) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of Susan D. Settenbrino, Pc v. Barroga-Hayes
967 N.E.2d 699 (New York Court of Appeals, 2012)