Singer v. Freedland
723 N.W.2d 870, 477 Mich. 952
This text of 723 N.W.2d 870 (Singer v. Freedland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Singer v. Freedland, 723 N.W.2d 870, 477 Mich. 952 (Mich. 2006).
Opinion
Ryan SINGER, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Michael FREEDLAND, M.D., Michael Freedland, M.D., P.C., and Visage Spa, L.L.C., Defendants-Appellants.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the November 1, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should now be reviewed by this Court. The motion to stay the trial court proceedings is DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Bush v. Spectrum Health Butterworth Campus
723 N.W.2d 870 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2006)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
723 N.W.2d 870, 477 Mich. 952, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/singer-v-freedland-mich-2006.