Singer v. Davis

Opinion

USCA1 Opinion

       [NOT FOR PUBLICATION–NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT]

                 United States Court of Appeals

                     For the First Circuit


Nos. 99-1092

     99-1376

     99-1581



                          SANDRA SINGER,



                      Plaintiff, Appellant,



                                v.



                   GEORGE DAVIS, JOINT VENTURE,

              PRIMO REALTY TRUST, DAVIS LIQUIDATIONS

                       TRUST, DIANA DAVIS,



                      Defendants, Appellees.


APPEALS FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT



                FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS



           [Hon. Robert E. Keeton, U.S. District Judge]


Before



                    Selya, Boudin and Lynch,

                        Circuit Judges.


Sandra M. Singer on brief pro se.

     Stewart A. Engel on brief for appellees.


September 16, 1999


Per Curiam.  Upon review of the briefs and record, we

  conclude that the district court properly dismissed plaintiff's

  complaint.  The issues raised, even were they not vague and

  unsupported, were inextricably intertwined with review of the

  state court proceedings.  Accordingly, the district court

  lacked jurisdiction to consider those claims.  See District of

  Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462, 476 (1983);

  Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co., 263 U.S. 413, 415-16 (1923);

  Lancellotti v. Fay, 909 F.2d 15, 17 (1st Cir. 1990). 

  Plaintiff's vague and unsupported allegations of denial of due

  process did not require any other result, and we find no merit

  in plaintiff's specific appellate arguments to the contrary.

            Affirmed.  See 1st Cir. Loc. R. 27.1.