Singer v. Commissioner
This text of 560 F.2d 196 (Singer v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
These appeals are from the decisions of the United States Tax Court determining deficiencies in the 1969 income taxes of appellants Paris G. Singer and Jane E. Singer in the sum of $94,094.90 and of $70,912.50 for appellants Oscar S. Gray and Eleanor L. Gray. The Grays’ deficiency results from the disallowance of deductions claimed for the worthlessness of stock in Gold Coast Telecasting Co., Inc., and certain debts owed Oscar Gray by that corporation. The Singers’ deficiency arises from the dis-allowance of worthless stock and bad debt deductions that also relate to Gold Coast and from the disallowance of a portion of a claimed deduction for legal fees. The only substantial issue presented is whether the lower court’s findings were clearly erroneous. We hold they were not, and relying upon the findings of fact and conclusions of law in Judge Raum’s able opinion, we affirm.1
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
560 F.2d 196, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/singer-v-commissioner-ca5-1977.