Singer v. 3675 Bird Road, Inc.
This text of 543 So. 2d 1320 (Singer v. 3675 Bird Road, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We affirm the trial court’s entry of final summary judgment. The criminal attack on appellants was not foreseeable; thus, as a matter of law, appellees had no duty to take steps to prevent its occurrence. See Lomillo v. Howard Johnsons Co., 471 So.2d 1296 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); Admiral’s Port Condominium Assoc., Inc. v. Feldman, 426 So.2d 1054 (Fla.3d DCA), review denied, 434 So.2d 887 (Fla.1983); Chateloin v. Flanigan’s Enter., Inc., 423 So.2d 1002 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Badillo v. DeVivo, 161 Ill.App.3d 596, 113 Ill.Dec. 696, 515 N.E.2d 681, appeal denied, 117 Ill.2d 541, 115 Ill.Dec. 397, 517 N.E.2d 1083 (1987).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
543 So. 2d 1320, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1371, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 3198, 1989 WL 59938, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/singer-v-3675-bird-road-inc-fladistctapp-1989.