Singer v. 3675 Bird Road, Inc.

543 So. 2d 1320, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1371, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 3198, 1989 WL 59938
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 6, 1989·No. No. 88-2750·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s entry of final summary judgment. The criminal attack on appellants was not foreseeable; thus, as a matter of law, appellees had no duty to take steps to prevent its occurrence. See Lomillo v. Howard Johnsons Co., 471 So.2d 1296 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); Admiral’s Port Condominium Assoc., Inc. v. Feldman, 426 So.2d 1054 (Fla.3d DCA), review denied, 434 So.2d 887 (Fla.1983); Chateloin v. Flanigan’s Enter., Inc., 423 So.2d 1002 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Badillo v. DeVivo, 161 Ill.App.3d 596, 113 Ill.Dec. 696, 515 N.E.2d 681, appeal denied, 117 Ill.2d 541, 115 Ill.Dec. 397, 517 N.E.2d 1083 (1987).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Singer v. 3675 Bird Road, Inc., 543 So. 2d 1320, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1371, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 3198, 1989 WL 59938 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

543 So. 2d 1320 (Singer v. 3675 Bird Road, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Miller v. Armour Industrial Security, Inc.
563 So. 2d 835 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Beckler v. Hoffman
550 So. 2d 68 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
GOVT. EMP. INS. COMPANY v. Wright
543 So. 2d 1320 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)