Singer Steel Company v. Joseph Turk Manufacturing Company

Sixth Circuit

Singer Steel Company v. Joseph Turk Manufacturing Company

202 F.2d 154, 1953 U.S. App. LEXIS 3215

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 12, 1953

Docket11663_1

StatusPublished

This text of 202 F.2d 154 (Singer Steel Company v. Joseph Turk Manufacturing Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Singer Steel Company v. Joseph Turk Manufacturing Company, 202 F.2d 154, 1953 U.S. App. LEXIS 3215 (6th Cir. 1953).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this case, a judgment for $17,955, with interest, was awarded appellee as damages against the defendant for conversion of a quantity of steel which was the property of appellee and known by appellant to be such according to substantial evidence adduced;

And it appearing from a consideration of the record, the briefs of the attorneys and their oral arguments, that the judgment was properly awarded upon the basis of *155 the findings of fact of the District Court, which were supported by substantial evidence and were certainly not clearly erroneous ;

And it appearing further that the conclusions of law of the district judge were logically drawn and that his opinion reasoned to correct conclusions, stated therein;

The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In this case, a judgment for $17,955, with interest, was awarded appellee as damages against the defendant for conversion of a quantity of steel which was the property of appellee and known by appellant to be such according to substantial evidence adduced;

And it appearing from a consideration of the record, the briefs of the attorneys and their oral arguments, that the judgment was properly awarded upon the basis of *155 the findings of fact of the District Court, which were supported by substantial evidence and were certainly not clearly erroneous ;

And it appearing further that the conclusions of law of the district judge were logically drawn and that his opinion reasoned to correct conclusions, stated therein;

The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

202 F.2d 154, 1953 U.S. App. LEXIS 3215, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/singer-steel-company-v-joseph-turk-manufacturing-company-ca6-1953.