Singer Sewing Machine Co. v. Sloan
132 S.E. 105, 35 Ga. App. 128, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 581
Opinion
This being a claim case, and the entry of levy failing to show that the property at the time of the levy was found in the possession of the defendant in execution, the magistrate before whom the case was tried by a jury erred in ruling, in the presence of the jury, that the burden of proof was upon the claimant. The court, therefore, erred in not sustaining the certiorari. Singer Sewing Machine Co. v. Crawford, 34 Ga. App. 719 (131 S. E. 103).
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Singer Sewing Machine Co. v. Sloan, 132 S.E. 105, 35 Ga. App. 128, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 581 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926).
132 S.E. 105 (Singer Sewing Machine Co. v. Sloan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Singer Sewing Machine Co. v. Crawford
131 S.E. 103 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1925)