Singer Sewing Machine Co. v. Dacus & Co.

96 S.E. 8, 22 Ga. App. 297, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 313
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMay 14, 1918
Docket9555
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 96 S.E. 8 (Singer Sewing Machine Co. v. Dacus & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Singer Sewing Machine Co. v. Dacus & Co., 96 S.E. 8, 22 Ga. App. 297, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 313 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918).

Opinion

Broyles, P. J.

1. A certiorari which h%s been dismissed can be renewed within six months from the date of dismissal, unless the dismissal was upon the ground that no notice of the sanction of the certiorari and of the time and place of hearing was given to the opposite party, or unless for some reason the original petition was itself void. Citizens Banking Co. v. Paris, 119 Ga. 517 (46 S. E. 638); Bass v. Milledgeville, 121 Ga. 151 (48 S. E. 919); Veazey v. Crawfordville, 126 Ga. 89 (54 S. E. 817).

(а) Where there has been a failure to serve the opposite party with notice , of the sanction of the certiorari and of the time and place of hearing, that which was commenced as a good suit was never completed and perfected by service, and there was no suit to renew. Toole v. Davenport, 63 Ga. 161.

(б) To render a petition for certiorari void there (must be something inherently defective, in the petition itself'—something precedent to the issuance of the writ; as where the certiorari bond, or the pauper affidavit, was defective, or where the petition itself contained no sufficient assignment of error. Bass v. Milledgeville, supra.

2. Prom the foregoing ruling it follows that where a certiorari has been dismissed solely upon the ground that material'allegations in the petition were not verified by the answer of the trial magistrate, the eer-' tiorari could be renewed within six months from the date of its dismissal.

Judgment reversed.

Bloodworth and Harwell, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Schaffer v. City of Atlanta
258 S.E.2d 674 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1979)
Weaver v. Moss
30 S.E.2d 779 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1944)
Morris v. Battey
121 S.E. 125 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
96 S.E. 8, 22 Ga. App. 297, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 313, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/singer-sewing-machine-co-v-dacus-co-gactapp-1918.