Singer Sewing Machine Co. v. Barnett

1 Ga. L. Rep. 411
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Singer Sewing Machine Co. v. Barnett. Read the opinion of the Court — 76 Ga. 377
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided July 1, 1886·Published

Opinion

Blandford, J.

A constable cannot protect himself against a rule ■brought against him for not making the money due on a fi. fa. placed in his hands, on the ground that the execution did not follow the judgment under which it issued. It is the duty of a ministerial officer to ■execute every process placed in his hands which is regular and proper •on its face and which is issued by a person having authority to do so; and the fact that it may be avoidable because it does not follow the judgement, is no defense to him for failing to make the money thereunder. 19 Ga., 139, 268; Gladden, sheriff vs. Cobb. (Sept. Term, 1884)

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Singer Sewing Machine Co. v. Barnett, 1 Ga. L. Rep. 411 (Ga. 1886).

1 Ga. L. Rep. 411 (Singer Sewing Machine Co. v. Barnett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jordan v. Porterfield
19 Ga. 139 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1855)