SINGER, MICHAEL, PEOPLE v
This text of SINGER, MICHAEL, PEOPLE v (SINGER, MICHAEL, PEOPLE v) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
327 KA 12-00535 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., FAHEY, SCONIERS, VALENTINO, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,
V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
MICHAEL C. SINGER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
J. SCOTT PORTER, SENECA FALLS, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
BARRY L. PORSCH, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, WATERLOO, FOR RESPONDENT.
Appeal from a judgment of the Seneca County Court (Dennis F. Bender, J.), entered March 29, 2010. The judgment revoked defendant’s sentence of probation and imposed a sentence of imprisonment.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment revoking the sentence of probation previously imposed and sentencing him to a determinate term of incarceration, followed by three years of postrelease supervision. Contrary to defendant’s contention, we conclude that the record does not establish that County Court “ ‘was unaware that it had the ability to exercise its discretion in determining whether to impose a lesser period of postrelease supervision’ ” (People v McCrimager, 81 AD3d 1324, 1324). We reject defendant’s further contention that the duration of the period of postrelease supervision is unduly harsh or severe.
Entered: March 22, 2013 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
SINGER, MICHAEL, PEOPLE v, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/singer-michael-people-v-nyappdiv-2013.