Sines v. Urhen
This text of Sines v. Urhen (Sines v. Urhen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-6198
ROBERT T. SINES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
ROBERT URHEN; DOCTOR JAGUST; MEDICAL AND NURSING STAFF AT AVERY MITCHELL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Graham C. Mullen, Chief District Judge. (CA-04-221)
Submitted: May 31, 2005 Decided: June 20, 2005
Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert T. Sines, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Robert T. Sines appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28
U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Sines’ motion for
appointment of counsel and motions to add a party, and we affirm on
the grounds that he has failed to state a claim upon which relief
may be granted. See Sines v. Urhen, No. CA-04-221 (W.D.N.C. Dec.
17, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Sines v. Urhen, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sines-v-urhen-ca4-2005.