Siner v. Stearne

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Siner v. Stearne

25 A. 826, 155 Pa. 62, 1893 Pa. LEXIS 1187

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 16, 1893·No. Appeal, No. 6·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

We think this case is ruled by Bradstreet v. Everson, 72 Pa. 124, and by Morgan v. Tener, 83 Pa. 305. The defendants, having undertaken the collection of plaintiffs’ claims, are responsible for the neglect of the attorney employed by them by which the claims were lost. The question of defendants’ negligence was fairly submitted to the jury, and their verdict is conclusive upon the question of fact. ¡,

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

We think this case is ruled by Bradstreet v. Everson, 72 Pa. 124, and by Morgan v. Tener, 83 Pa. 305. The defendants, having undertaken the collection of plaintiffs’ claims, are responsible for the neglect of the attorney employed by them by which the claims were lost. The question of defendants’ negligence was fairly submitted to the jury, and their verdict is conclusive upon the question of fact. ¡,

Judgment affirmed.

Siner v. Stearne, 25 A. 826, 155 Pa. 62, 1893 Pa. LEXIS 1187 (Pa. 1893).

Pincite

25 A. 826 (Siner v. Stearne) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related