Siner v. Stearne

25 A. 826, 155 Pa. 62, 1893 Pa. LEXIS 1187
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJanuary 16, 1893
DocketAppeal, No. 6
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 25 A. 826 (Siner v. Stearne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Siner v. Stearne, 25 A. 826, 155 Pa. 62, 1893 Pa. LEXIS 1187 (Pa. 1893).

Opinion

Per Curiam,

We think this case is ruled by Bradstreet v. Everson, 72 Pa. 124, and by Morgan v. Tener, 83 Pa. 305. The defendants, having undertaken the collection of plaintiffs’ claims, are responsible for the neglect of the attorney employed by them by which the claims were lost. The question of defendants’ negligence was fairly submitted to the jury, and their verdict is conclusive upon the question of fact. ¡,

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Klein, Exrx. v. May Stern Co.
19 A.2d 566 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1940)
New York Hotel Statler Co. v. Girard National Bank
87 Pa. Super. 94 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1925)
City National Bank v. Cooper & Griffin
74 S.E. 366 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1912)
Morris v. First National Bank
50 A. 1000 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1902)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
25 A. 826, 155 Pa. 62, 1893 Pa. LEXIS 1187, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/siner-v-stearne-pa-1893.