Sindram v. Vanyur

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: September 13, 2001
• Docket: 01-6471
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-6471

MICHAEL J. SINDRAM,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

J. M. VANYUR, Warden,

Defendant - Appellee.

No. 01-6787

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-98-857-5-H)

Submitted: September 6, 2001 Decided: September 13, 2001 Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael J. Sindram, Appellant Pro Se. Jerri Ulrica Dunston, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Michael J. Sindram appeals from

the district court’s orders and judgment granting summary judgment

to John M. Vanyur and dismissing his civil rights complaint and

denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the rec-

ord and the district court’s orders and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See

Sindram v. Vanyur, No. CA-98-857-5-H (E.D.N.C. Mar. 1, 2001 & Apr.

3, 2001). We deny Sindram’s motion for appointment of counsel. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED