Sindram v. United States

Fourth Circuit

Sindram v. United States

467 F. App'x 227

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 23, 2012

DocketNo. 11-7674

StatusPublished

This text of 467 F. App'x 227 (Sindram v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sindram v. United States, 467 F. App'x 227 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Michael Sindram appeals the district court’s order denying his petition for a writ of error coram nobis. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sindram v. United States, No. 8:ll-cv-03045-DKC, 2011 WL 5402913 (D.Md. Nov. 7, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Michael Sindram appeals the district court’s order denying his petition for a writ of error coram nobis. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sindram v. United States, No. 8:ll-cv-03045-DKC, 2011 WL 5402913 (D.Md. Nov. 7, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

467 F. App'x 227, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sindram-v-united-states-ca4-2012.