Sindram v. Shinseki
This text of Sindram v. Shinseki (Sindram v. Shinseki) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit _____________________
MICHAEL SINDRAM, Claimant-Appellant,
v.
ERIC K. SHINSEKI, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Respondent-Appellee.
____________________
2011-7075 ______________________
Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims in no. 08-3676, Judge Lawrence B. Hagel. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
KATHERINE A. HELM, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett, LLP, of New York, New York, argued for claimant-appellant.
SCOTT D. AUSTIN, Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for respondent-appellee. On the brief were TONY WEST, Assistant Attorney General, JEANNE E. DAVIDSON, Director, MARTIN F. HOCKEY, JR., Assistant Director, and NELSON R. RICHARDS, Trial Attorney. Of counsel on the brief were F. JOHN BRIZZI, JR., Deputy Assistant General Counsel, and MICHELLE D. BERNSTEIN, Attorney, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, of Washington, DC. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (LOURIE, MOORE, and WALLACH, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
March 7, 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Sindram v. Shinseki, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sindram-v-shinseki-cafc-2012.