Sindram v. Presidential Towers Condominium

115 F. App'x 131
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 14, 2004·No. No. 04-2130·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Michael J. Sindram appeals a district court order denying his motion for reconsideration under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 60(b). We have reviewed the district court’s order and the record and find the appeal frivolous. Sindram failed to allege any proper grounds for reconsideration. Moreover, on appeal, he failed to specifically challenge the district court’s findings in this regard. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal as frivolous. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sindram v. Presidential Towers Condominium, 115 F. App'x 131 (4th Cir. 2004).

115 F. App'x 131 (Sindram v. Presidential Towers Condominium) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.