Sindoni v. La Rosa

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Sindoni v. La Rosa

86 N.J.L. 370

DecidedMarch 6, 1914

StatusPublished

This text of 86 N.J.L. 370 (Sindoni v. La Rosa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sindoni v. La Rosa, 86 N.J.L. 370 (N.J. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court affirming a judgment of the District Court of Atlantic City. The affirmance in the Supreme Court was put upon the ground that it was a fact case and was properly submitted to the jury. We concur in that view, and, consequently, as there is evidence to sustain the finding of the Supreme Court, upon familiar principles, it will not be disturbed.

For affirmance- — Th e Chancellor, Ci-iiee Justice, Teencitard, Parker, Bergen, Kalisch, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Congdon, White, Heppenheimer- JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Curiam.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court affirming a judgment of the District Court of Atlantic City. The affirmance in the Supreme Court was put upon the ground that it was a fact case and was properly submitted to the jury. We concur in that view, and, consequently, as there is evidence to sustain the finding of the Supreme Court, upon familiar principles, it will not be disturbed.

For affirmance- — Th e Chancellor, Ci-iiee Justice, Teencitard, Parker, Bergen, Kalisch, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Congdon, White, Heppenheimer- JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

86 N.J.L. 370, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sindoni-v-la-rosa-nj-1914.