Sindle v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.

115 A. 2, 96 N.J.L. 553, 1921 N.J. LEXIS 222
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided September 23, 1921·Published·Cited by 13 cases

Opinion

Pee CueiajU.

The judgment under review herein should, be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court.

[555] For a-ffirmance — Tira Chancellor, Chief Justice, Bergen, Heepeniieiaier, Williams, Gardner, JJ. 6.

For reversal—Treno hard, Parker, Minturn, Ackeeson, Van Buskiek, JJ. 5.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sindle v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co., 115 A. 2, 96 N.J.L. 553, 1921 N.J. LEXIS 222 (N.J. 1921).

115 A. 2 (Sindle v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

T. v. H.
245 A.2d 221 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1968)
B. v. O.
232 A.2d 401 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1967)
State v. Gibson
223 A.2d 638 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1966)
Pedalino v. BD. OF REVIEW, DIV. OF EMPLOY. SEC'Y
200 A.2d 351 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1964)
Wolf v. Zoning Bd. of Adjust. of Park Ridge
192 A.2d 305 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1963)
Commercial Can Corp. v. STEEL METAL, ETC.
160 A.2d 855 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1960)
State v. Lucas
152 A.2d 50 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1959)
Jantausch v. Borough of Verona
131 A.2d 881 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1957)
Wagner v. Mayor, Etc., City of Newark
126 A.2d 71 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1956)
Jantausch v. Borough of Verona
124 A.2d 14 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1956)
Clary v. Borough of Eatontown
124 A.2d 54 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1956)
Rodesky v. City of Paterson
17 A.2d 49 (New Jersey Department of Labor Workmen's Compensation Bureau, 1940)