Sinderson v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Sinderson v. State

1912 OK CR 73, 120 P. 1133, 6 Okla. Crim. 723, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 350

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedJanuary 23, 1912

DocketNo. A-976.

StatusPublished

This text of 1912 OK CR 73 (Sinderson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sinderson v. State, 1912 OK CR 73, 120 P. 1133, 6 Okla. Crim. 723, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 350 (Okla. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, Ben Sinderson, was convicted in the county court of Garfield county on the 19th day of September, 1910, on a charge of having unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor with intent to sell the same, and on the 23rd day thereafter was adjudged by the court in accordance with the verdict of the jury to pay a fine of fifty dollars and be confined in the county jail for a period of thirty days. The proof in this case shows possession, but there is no proof of intent to sell as contemplated by the statute. There is no proof of payment of the special revenue tax as provided by law, or of any other competent fact upon which to base the conviction. The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, Ben Sinderson, was convicted in the county court of Garfield county on the 19th day of September, 1910, on a charge of having unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor with intent to sell the same, and on the 23rd day thereafter was adjudged by the court in accordance with the verdict of the jury to pay a fine of fifty dollars and be confined in the county jail for a period of thirty days. The proof in this case shows possession, but there is no proof of intent to sell as contemplated by the statute. There is no proof of payment of the special revenue tax as provided by law, or of any other competent fact upon which to base the conviction. The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1912 OK CR 73, 120 P. 1133, 6 Okla. Crim. 723, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 350, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sinderson-v-state-oklacrimapp-1912.