Sinclair v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Sinclair v. State

147 So. 3d 33, 2013 WL 5848628, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 17317

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 31, 2013·No. No. 1D13-4813·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED as unauthorized pursuant to Baker v. State, 878 So.2d 1236 (Fla.2004). Moreover, we conclude that the petition is clearly frivolous, inasmuch as it raises a claim that has been considered and rejected as unfounded at least twice by the trial court, whose rulings in this regard have been affirmed on appeal by this court. Accordingly, we direct the clerk of the court to forward a copy of this opinion to the appropriate institution within the Department of Corrections for consideration of disciplinary measures against Sinclair pursuant to section 944.279(1), Florida Statutes.

LEWIS, C.J., ROWE and MAKAR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED as unauthorized pursuant to Baker v. State, 878 So.2d 1236 (Fla.2004). Moreover, we conclude that the petition is clearly frivolous, inasmuch as it raises a claim that has been considered and rejected as unfounded at least twice by the trial court, whose rulings in this regard have been affirmed on appeal by this court. Accordingly, we direct the clerk of the court to forward a copy of this opinion to the appropriate institution within the Department of Corrections for consideration of disciplinary measures against Sinclair pursuant to section 944.279(1), Florida Statutes.

LEWIS, C.J., ROWE and MAKAR, JJ., concur.

Sinclair v. State, 147 So. 3d 33, 2013 WL 5848628, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 17317 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

147 So. 3d 33 (Sinclair v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related