Sinclair v. Sinclair

191 A.D.2d 421, 596 N.Y.S.2d 694, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1808

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries arising out of an automobile accident, the plaintiff Denise Sinclair appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Tanenbaum, J.), dated December 27, 1990, which granted the respondent’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims asserted against her.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The evidence submitted in support of the respondent’s motion was sufficient to warrant the granting of summary judgment (see, Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562; Friends of Animals v Associated Fur Mfrs., 46 NY2d 1065, 1067-1068). Moreover, the papers submitted in opposition to the motion failed to raise the existence of any bona fide issues of fact (see, Zuckerman v City of New York, supra). Bracken, J. P., Lawrence, Miller, Copertino and Santucci, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sinclair v. Sinclair, 191 A.D.2d 421, 596 N.Y.S.2d 694, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1808 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

191 A.D.2d 421 (Sinclair v. Sinclair) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Friends of Animals, Inc. v. Associated Fur Manufacturers, Inc.
390 N.E.2d 298 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)
Zuckerman v. City of New York
404 N.E.2d 718 (New York Court of Appeals, 1980)