Sinclair v. Sinclair

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sinclair v. Sinclair

191 A.D.2d 421, 596 N.Y.S.2d 694, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1808

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 1, 1993

StatusPublished

This text of 191 A.D.2d 421 (Sinclair v. Sinclair) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sinclair v. Sinclair, 191 A.D.2d 421, 596 N.Y.S.2d 694, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1808 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries arising out of an automobile accident, the plaintiff Denise Sinclair appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Tanenbaum, J.), dated December 27, 1990, which granted the respondent’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims asserted against her.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The evidence submitted in support of the respondent’s motion was sufficient to warrant the granting of summary judgment (see, Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562; Friends of Animals v Associated Fur Mfrs., 46 NY2d 1065, 1067-1068). Moreover, the papers submitted in opposition to the motion failed to raise the existence of any bona fide issues of fact (see, Zuckerman v City of New York, supra). Bracken, J. P., Lawrence, Miller, Copertino and Santucci, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries arising out of an automobile accident, the plaintiff Denise Sinclair appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Tanenbaum, J.), dated December 27, 1990, which granted the respondent’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims asserted against her.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The evidence submitted in support of the respondent’s motion was sufficient to warrant the granting of summary judgment (see, Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562; Friends of Animals v Associated Fur Mfrs., 46 NY2d 1065, 1067-1068). Moreover, the papers submitted in opposition to the motion failed to raise the existence of any bona fide issues of fact (see, Zuckerman v City of New York, supra). Bracken, J. P., Lawrence, Miller, Copertino and Santucci, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

191 A.D.2d 421, 596 N.Y.S.2d 694, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1808, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sinclair-v-sinclair-nyappdiv-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack