Sinclair v. City of Seattle

W.D. Washington

Sinclair v. City of Seattle

DecidedAugust 30, 2021

Docket2:21-cv-00571

StatusUnknown

This text of Sinclair v. City of Seattle (Sinclair v. City of Seattle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. Washington primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sinclair v. City of Seattle, (W.D. Wash. 2021).

Pincite

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5

6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 9 10 DONNITTA SINCLAIR, CASE NO. 2:21-cv-00571-JCC-JRC 11 Plaintiff, ORDER ON MOTION FOR LEAVE 12 v. TO PARTICIPATE AS AMICI CURIAE 13 CITY OF SEATTLE, 14 Defendant. 15 16 This matter is referred to the undersigned by the District Court. Dkt. 9. Before the Court 17 is the National Police Association’s (NPA) motion for leave to participate as amicus curiae. Dkt. 18 16. Defendant does not oppose the motion but asks to have an opportunity to respond by 19 September 3, 2021, if the Court grants the motion. See Dkt. 19, at 2. NPA’s motion is currently 20 noted for September 10, 2021. See Dkt. 16. However, District Courts have inherent authority to 21 control their dockets. See Ready Transp., Inc. v. AAR Mfg., Inc., 627 F.3d 402, 404 (9th Cir. 22 2010). 23 /// 24 1 Therefore, having found good cause, the Court ORDERS the following: 2 • The Clerk is directed to renote NPA’s motion (Dkt. 16) to the date of this Order; 3 • NPA is granted leave to file its proposed memorandum; and 4 • Defendant shall file any response by September 3, 2021, and shall not exceed six 5 pages.

6 Dated this 30th day of August, 2021. 7 A 8 J. Richard Creatura 9 Chief United States Magistrate Judge

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

1 2 3 4 5

6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 9 10 DONNITTA SINCLAIR, CASE NO. 2:21-cv-00571-JCC-JRC 11 Plaintiff, ORDER ON MOTION FOR LEAVE 12 v. TO PARTICIPATE AS AMICI CURIAE 13 CITY OF SEATTLE, 14 Defendant. 15 16 This matter is referred to the undersigned by the District Court. Dkt. 9. Before the Court 17 is the National Police Association’s (NPA) motion for leave to participate as amicus curiae. Dkt. 18 16. Defendant does not oppose the motion but asks to have an opportunity to respond by 19 September 3, 2021, if the Court grants the motion. See Dkt. 19, at 2. NPA’s motion is currently 20 noted for September 10, 2021. See Dkt. 16. However, District Courts have inherent authority to 21 control their dockets. See Ready Transp., Inc. v. AAR Mfg., Inc., 627 F.3d 402, 404 (9th Cir. 22 2010). 23 /// 24 1 Therefore, having found good cause, the Court ORDERS the following: 2 • The Clerk is directed to renote NPA’s motion (Dkt. 16) to the date of this Order; 3 • NPA is granted leave to file its proposed memorandum; and 4 • Defendant shall file any response by September 3, 2021, and shall not exceed six 5 pages.

6 Dated this 30th day of August, 2021. 7 A 8 J. Richard Creatura 9 Chief United States Magistrate Judge

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Sinclair v. City of Seattle, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sinclair-v-city-of-seattle-wawd-2021.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack