Sinclair Refining Co. v. Louisiana

311 U.S. 609, 61 S. Ct. 39
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 14, 1940·No. No. 286·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a properly presented federal question. (1) Godchaux Co. v. Estopinal, 251 U. S. 179; Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co., 261 U. S. 114, 117; Herndon v. Georgia, 295 U. S. 441, 443; (2) Louisville & Nashville R. Co. v. Schmidt, 177 U. S. 230, 236; Holmes v. Conway, 241 U. S. 624, 631-632; Hardware Dealers Insurance Co. v. Glidden Co., 284 U. S. 151, 158.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sinclair Refining Co. v. Louisiana, 311 U.S. 609, 61 S. Ct. 39 (1940).

311 U.S. 609 (Sinclair Refining Co. v. Louisiana) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Daspit v. Sinclair Refining Co.
6 So. 2d 341 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1942)