Sinclair Refining Co. v. Louisiana
311 U.S. 609, 61 S. Ct. 39
Opinion
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a properly presented federal question. (1) Godchaux Co. v. Estopinal, 251 U. S. 179; Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co., 261 U. S. 114, 117; Herndon v. Georgia, 295 U. S. 441, 443; (2) Louisville & Nashville R. Co. v. Schmidt, 177 U. S. 230, 236; Holmes v. Conway, 241 U. S. 624, 631-632; Hardware Dealers Insurance Co. v. Glidden Co., 284 U. S. 151, 158.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sinclair Refining Co. v. Louisiana, 311 U.S. 609, 61 S. Ct. 39 (1940).
311 U.S. 609 (Sinclair Refining Co. v. Louisiana) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Daspit v. Sinclair Refining Co.
6 So. 2d 341 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1942)