Sinclair Refining Co. v. H. C. Roulston, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sinclair Refining Co. v. H. C. Roulston, Inc.

243 A.D. 639

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 15, 1935

StatusPublished

This text of 243 A.D. 639 (Sinclair Refining Co. v. H. C. Roulston, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sinclair Refining Co. v. H. C. Roulston, Inc., 243 A.D. 639 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

— Action for damages to the plaintiff’s building by reason of the defendant’s carelessness in the operation of a motor truck which, it is claimed, was driven with violence off the public highway and against plaintiff’s building. Defendant’s motion for a bill of particulars was denied by the Special Term because the printed forms used on said motion contain many matters having no relevancy to the plaintiff’s cause of action. Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, without prejudice to a renewal of said motion by the defendant upon proper papers. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Scudder, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Action for damages to the plaintiff’s building by reason of the defendant’s carelessness in the operation of a motor truck which, it is claimed, was driven with violence off the public highway and against plaintiff’s building. Defendant’s motion for a bill of particulars was denied by the Special Term because the printed forms used on said motion contain many matters having no relevancy to the plaintiff’s cause of action. Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, without prejudice to a renewal of said motion by the defendant upon proper papers. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Scudder, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

243 A.D. 639, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sinclair-refining-co-v-h-c-roulston-inc-nyappdiv-1935.