Sinclair Refining Co. v. Davis
This text of 171 S.E. 150 (Sinclair Refining Co. v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. A breach of a contract as to a matter so substantial and fundamental as to defeat the object of the contract may authorize a rescission of the contract by the opposite party. 13 C. J. 613; 6 R. C. L. 930.
2. Where premises equipped for use as a gasoline and oil service station are leased for a term, and the rent reserved consists of a designated sum of money per gallon on all gasoline which the lessee shall sell upon the premises during the term of the lease, the rent not to be less than $10 a month, it is clearly within the contemplation of the parties to the contract that the lessee shall, during the term of the lease, operate upon the premises a service station for the sale of gasoline; and where the lessee, after taking possession of the premises under the lease, fails to operate thereon a service station for the sale of gasoline, although he may continue to occupy the premises, this amounts to a breach of the lease in a matter so substantial and fundamental as to defeat the object of the lease, and the lessor may rescind. The lessor may treat the lessee, for the period of the occupancy of the premises, as a tenant at sufferance or at will, and may collect, as rent for the period of time actually occupied by the lessee, a sum of money equal to the rental value of the premises.
3. The petition in this case, in which the lessor under such a lease sought to recover from the lessee the rental value of the premises for the time occupied, set out a cause of action, and the demurrer was properly overruled.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
171 S.E. 150, 47 Ga. App. 601, 1933 Ga. App. LEXIS 575, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sinclair-refining-co-v-davis-gactapp-1933.