Simunich

Court of Claims

Simunich

191 Ct. Cl. 807, 1970 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 44, 1970 WL 3598

CourtUnited States Court of Claims

DecidedMarch 13, 1970

DocketNo. 371-69

StatusPublished

This text of 191 Ct. Cl. 807 (Simunich) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Simunich, 191 Ct. Cl. 807, 1970 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 44, 1970 WL 3598 (cc 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

Court of Claims jurisdiction. — Plaintiff seeks compensation because of alleged denial by the National Labor Bela-tions Board of a hearing respecting certain charges against plaintiff’s employer and the Union concerning his seniority, and of denial by the Board of plaintiff’s appeal from the [808]*808Eegional Director’s refusal to issue a complaint respecting bis job recall rights. This case comes before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss the petition and plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. Upon consideration thereof, together with the responses in opposition thereto, without oral argument, the court concluded that it lacks jurisdiction over plaintiff’s alleged claim. On March 13,1970, the court granted defendant’s motion, denied plaintiff’s motion, and dismissed the petition. On June 5,1970 the court denied plaintiff’s motion to review the dismissal of his petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Court of Claims jurisdiction. — Plaintiff seeks compensation because of alleged denial by the National Labor Bela-tions Board of a hearing respecting certain charges against plaintiff’s employer and the Union concerning his seniority, and of denial by the Board of plaintiff’s appeal from the [808]*808Eegional Director’s refusal to issue a complaint respecting bis job recall rights. This case comes before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss the petition and plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. Upon consideration thereof, together with the responses in opposition thereto, without oral argument, the court concluded that it lacks jurisdiction over plaintiff’s alleged claim. On March 13,1970, the court granted defendant’s motion, denied plaintiff’s motion, and dismissed the petition. On June 5,1970 the court denied plaintiff’s motion to review the dismissal of his petition.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

191 Ct. Cl. 807, 1970 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 44, 1970 WL 3598, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/simunich-cc-1970.