Simuel v. Curry
This text of Simuel v. Curry (Simuel v. Curry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-7668
DONTEZ LAMONT SIMUEL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
GEORGE CURRY, Superintendent at Polk Youth Institution; MS. FAULT, Medical Administrator; EARL ECHARDS, Physician; BETTY REED, Registered Nurse; RICHARD JONES; MS. SNIDER, L.P.N.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-02-636-5-H)
Submitted: January 16, 2003 Decided: January 27, 2003
Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dontez Lamont Simuel, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Dontez Lamont Simuel appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28
U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. See Simuel v. Curry, No. CA-02-636-5-H (E.D.N.C.
filed Oct. 21, 2002, entered Oct. 23, 2002). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Simuel v. Curry, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/simuel-v-curry-ca4-2003.