Sims v. TRILLA-NESCO CORP.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Sims v. TRILLA-NESCO CORP.

343 S.W.3d 679, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 683, 2011 WL 1875456

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 17, 2011

DocketED 95671

StatusPublished

This text of 343 S.W.3d 679 (Sims v. TRILLA-NESCO CORP.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sims v. TRILLA-NESCO CORP., 343 S.W.3d 679, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 683, 2011 WL 1875456 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Corey Sims (Employee) appeals from the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (the Commission) denying him unemployment benefits. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that there is sufficient competent and substantial evidence to support the Commission’s decision that Employee’s actions constituted misconduct associated with his work. Berwin v. Lindenwood Female College, 205 S.W.3d 291, 294 (Mo.App. E.D.2006). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Corey Sims (Employee) appeals from the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (the Commission) denying him unemployment benefits. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that there is sufficient competent and substantial evidence to support the Commission’s decision that Employee’s actions constituted misconduct associated with his work. Berwin v. Lindenwood Female College, 205 S.W.3d 291, 294 (Mo.App. E.D.2006). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

343 S.W.3d 679, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 683, 2011 WL 1875456, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sims-v-trilla-nesco-corp-moctapp-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack