Sims v. State

91 S.W. 579, 49 Tex. Crim. 199, 1906 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 9
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided January 17, 1906·No. No. 3511.·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

DAVIDSOU, Presiding Judge.

Under an indictment charging assault, to rape, appellant was convicted of aggravated- assault. It is made to appear affirmatively by bill of exceptions, by certificate of the judge, by affidavit of several parties, that appellant was not called upon to plead to the indictment, and that in fact he did not enter a plea, and the same was tried without such plea being made or entered. This was properly raised in the trial court, and was overruled, because appellant and his counsel remained silent when they discovered the fact that the prosecuting officers as well as the court had failed to call upon appellant to enter his plea. It is necessary under the statute and all the adjudicated authorities that the plea must be entered where a party is placed upon trial in a criminal cause. White’s Ann. Code Criminal Procedure, articles 552, 553, 640, 641, 904, and authorities collated under these articles. Thompson v. State, 80 S. W. Rep., 623; Clark v. State, 32 Texas Crim. Rep., 412; 24 S. W. Rep., 29; Shaw v. State, 17 Texas Crim. App., 225; Jefferson v. State, 24 Texas Crim. App., 535. The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sims v. State, 91 S.W. 579, 49 Tex. Crim. 199, 1906 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 9 (Tex. 1906).

91 S.W. 579 (Sims v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lumsden v. State
384 S.W.2d 143 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1964)
Seale v. State
256 S.W.2d 86 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1953)