Sims v. State
This text of 91 S.W. 579 (Sims v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Under an indictment charging assault, to rape, appellant was convicted of aggravated- assault. It is made to appear affirmatively by bill of exceptions, by certificate of the judge, by affidavit of several parties, that appellant was not called upon to plead to the indictment, and that in fact he did not enter a plea, and the same was tried without such plea being made or entered. This was properly raised in the trial court, and was overruled, because appellant and his counsel remained silent when they discovered the fact that the prosecuting officers as well as the court had failed to call upon appellant to enter his plea. It is necessary under the statute and all the adjudicated authorities that the plea must be entered where a party is placed upon trial in a criminal cause. White’s Ann. Code Criminal Procedure, articles 552, 553, 640, 641, 904, and authorities collated under these articles. Thompson v. State, 80 S. W. Rep., 623; Clark v. State, 32 Texas Crim. Rep., 412; 24 S. W. Rep., 29; Shaw v. State, 17 Texas Crim. App., 225; Jefferson v. State, 24 Texas Crim. App., 535. The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
91 S.W. 579, 49 Tex. Crim. 199, 1906 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 9, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sims-v-state-texcrimapp-1906.