Sims v. State

114 So. 3d 454, 2013 WL 2420438, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 8835
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Sims v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 14542
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 5, 2013·No. No. 4D11-3082·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals his convictions and sentence to life in prison for burglary of an occupied structure, robbery, burglary of a conveyance, and grand theft of a motor vehicle, all of which were committed while appellant was armed with a firearm. Appellant claims the trial court should have granted his motion for mistrial and to strike the jury panel because of comments made by the judge during voir dire. He also claims the trial court should have suppressed an out-of-court identification made by the victim as impermissibly suggestive. We find these issues to be without merit and, as such, we affirm.

Affirmed.

MAY, C.J., GERBER and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sims v. State, 114 So. 3d 454, 2013 WL 2420438, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 8835 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

114 So. 3d 454 (Sims v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.