Sims v. State

513 So. 2d 671
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 9, 1987·No. 86-1844·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

513 So.2d 671 (1987)

James Willie SIMS, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 86-1844.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 1, 1987.
On Motion for Rehearing September 9, 1987.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and A.N. Radabaugh, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Lauren Hafner Sewell, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

SCHEB, A.C.J., and CAMPBELL and LEHAN, JJ., concur.

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

In this appeal we affirmed the defendant's conviction and sentence. On rehearing the defendant has requested that we certify to the supreme court the same question we certified in Hoefert v. State, 509 So.2d 1090 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987), and Washington v. State, 508 So.2d 565 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987).

Accordingly, we grant the defendant's request and again certify to the supreme court, as a question of great public importance, the question certified in Hoefert and Washington:

IS THE HABITUAL OFFENDER STATUTE STILL AN EFFECTIVE BASIS ON WHICH TO EXCEED THE STATUTORY MAXIMUM AS LONG AS THE SENTENCE IMPOSED DOES NOT EXCEED THE GUIDELINES RECOMMENDATION?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sims v. State, 513 So. 2d 671 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

513 So. 2d 671 (Sims v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sims v. State
523 So. 2d 574 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1988)
Inscho v. State
521 So. 2d 164 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Cowles v. State
517 So. 2d 771 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Gainey v. State
518 So. 2d 309 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)