Sims v. State

360 So. 2d 801, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15956
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Sims v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 369 So. 2d 431
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 12, 1978·No. Nos. 77-1833 and 77-1834 Consolidated·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s probation supervisor filed affidavits charging appellant, who was on probation in two separate cases, with violating conditions (2), (4), (7), (10), and (14) of his probation. At the hearing on the affidavits, the trial court heard evidence of violations of conditions (2), (7), (10), and (14) and then revoked probation. We affirm that revocation, but we agree with appellant that there is an imperfection in the orders revoking probation.

The orders state that appellant was guilty of violating conditions (2), (4), and (7). However, since the court did not hear evidence concerning a violation of condition (4) it should now remove any reference to that condition. See Brewster v. State, 352 So.2d 1267 (Fla.2d DCA 1977).

Accordingly, we remand the case for correction of the revocation orders as expressed in this opinion. Appellant need not be present for that purpose.

HOBSON, Acting C. J., and BOARD-MAN and OTT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sims v. State, 360 So. 2d 801, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15956 (Fla. Ct. App. 1978).

360 So. 2d 801 (Sims v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brewster v. State
352 So. 2d 1267 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1977)