Sims v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Sims v. State

625 So. 2d 1192, 1993 WL 272396

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

DecidedJuly 23, 1993

DocketCR-92-0465

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 625 So. 2d 1192 (Sims v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sims v. State, 625 So. 2d 1192, 1993 WL 272396 (Ala. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

Oscar Sims appeals the dismissal of his petition for writ of habeas corpus¹ in which he claims that he is entitled to retroactive credit for correctional incentive time. Sims alleges, inter alia, that the exception to § 14-9-41(h), Code of Alabama 1975 (Supp. 1992), for those convicted of sexual offenses, upon which the Department of Corrections relied to deny him retroactive correctional incentive time,² is violative of the Equal Protection Clause of the United States Constitution. We agree. In the recent case of Brooks v. State,622 So.2d 447 (Ala.Cr.App. 1993), we held that the exception to § 14-9-41(h) omitting sex offenders from those prisoners allowed retroactive good time violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Upon the authority of that case, we reverse the judgment and remand this case to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with Brooks.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

BOWEN, P.J., and TAYLOR and McMILLAN, JJ., concur.

MONTIEL, J., dissents, without opinion.

¹ Sims's petition is styled "Petition for Writ of Certiorari"; however, the proper remedy is by a petition for writ of habeas corpus, and the circuit court treated his petition as one for habeas corpus.

² An affidavit signed by the director of records of the Department of Corrections states specifically that the Department relied upon the sex offender exception to §14-9-41(h) to deny Sims retroactive correctional incentive time. Furthermore, the circuit court, in its order dismissing the petition for writ of habeas corpus, stated that it also relied upon the sex offender exception to § 14-9-41(h).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Oscar Sims appeals the dismissal of his petition for writ of habeas corpus¹ in which he claims that he is entitled to retroactive credit for correctional incentive time. Sims alleges, inter alia, that the exception to § 14-9-41(h), Code of Alabama 1975 (Supp. 1992), for those convicted of sexual offenses, upon which the Department of Corrections relied to deny him retroactive correctional incentive time,² is violative of the Equal Protection Clause of the United States Constitution. We agree. In the recent case of Brooks v. State,622 So.2d 447 (Ala.Cr.App. 1993), we held that the exception to § 14-9-41(h) omitting sex offenders from those prisoners allowed retroactive good time violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Upon the authority of that case, we reverse the judgment and remand this case to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with Brooks.