Sims v. New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sims v. New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct

94 A.D.2d 946, 463 N.Y.S.2d 747, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18413

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 25, 1983

DocketAppeal No. 1

StatusPublished

This text of 94 A.D.2d 946 (Sims v. New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sims v. New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct, 94 A.D.2d 946, 463 N.Y.S.2d 747, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18413 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: For the reasons stated by Special Term (McLaughlin, J.), the extraordinary relief of prohibition was properly denied and petitioner’s CPLR article 78 proceeding dismissed. Petitioner on appeal argues that the commission exceeded its authority by asking her to respond to questions concerning matters not enumerated in the administrator’s complaints. Inasmuch as she appeared and gave testimony concerning these allegations, this issue has become moot (see Matter of Richter v State Comm. on Judicial Conduct, 85 AD2d 790, mot for lv to app den 56 NY2d 508). (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, McLaughlin, J. — art 78.) Present — Hancock, Jr., J. P., Callahan, Doerr, Boomer and Moule, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: For the reasons stated by Special Term (McLaughlin, J.), the extraordinary relief of prohibition was properly denied and petitioner’s CPLR article 78 proceeding dismissed. Petitioner on appeal argues that the commission exceeded its authority by asking her to respond to questions concerning matters not enumerated in the administrator’s complaints. Inasmuch as she appeared and gave testimony concerning these allegations, this issue has become moot (see Matter of Richter v State Comm. on Judicial Conduct, 85 AD2d 790, mot for lv to app den 56 NY2d 508). (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, McLaughlin, J. — art 78.) Present — Hancock, Jr., J. P., Callahan, Doerr, Boomer and Moule, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

94 A.D.2d 946, 463 N.Y.S.2d 747, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18413, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sims-v-new-york-state-commission-on-judicial-conduct-nyappdiv-1983.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack