Sims v. Mutual Life Ins. Co.

87 S.E. 999, 103 S.C. 214, 1916 S.C. LEXIS 10
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided February 26, 1916·No. 9272·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Chief Justice Gary.

The only question raised by the appeal is, whether there was error on the part of his Honor, the Circuit Judge, in allowing the plaintiff to amend his complaint in the particulars mentioned in the record.

The right to allow the plaintiff‘to amend the complainl was within the discretion of his Honor, the Circuit Judge ■ which, it has not been made to appear, was erroneously exer cised.

It is only necessary to cite the case of Taylor v. R. R. Co. 81 S. C. 574, 62 S. E. 1113, to show that the order allowing the amendment was properly granted.

Appeal dismissed.

Mr. Justice Eraser took no part in the decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sims v. Mutual Life Ins. Co., 87 S.E. 999, 103 S.C. 214, 1916 S.C. LEXIS 10 (S.C. 1916).

87 S.E. 999 (Sims v. Mutual Life Ins. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coral Gables, Inc. v. Palmetto Brick Co.
191 S.E. 337 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1937)
Laird v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad
134 S.E. 220 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1926)
Mallard Lumber Co. v. Carolina Portland Cement Co.
132 S.E. 614 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1926)