Sims v. Howard Motor Homes

Missouri Court of Appeals

Sims v. Howard Motor Homes

850 S.W.2d 437, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 578, 1993 WL 118513

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 20, 1993·No. No. 62211·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Claimant, Carl G. Sims, appeals from a final award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission. The Commission reversed the awards of the Administrative Law Judge of the Division of Workers’ Compensation and denied claimant compensation for two separate work-related injuries. We affirm. We have reviewed the briefs and arguments of the parties, the transcript and the legal file, and can find no error on the part of the Commission. In addition, we find that no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. Claimant’s appeal is, therefore, affirmed pursuant to rule 84.16(b). The parties have been provided with a memorandum, solely for their own information, setting out the reasons for our decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Claimant, Carl G. Sims, appeals from a final award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission. The Commission reversed the awards of the Administrative Law Judge of the Division of Workers’ Compensation and denied claimant compensation for two separate work-related injuries. We affirm. We have reviewed the briefs and arguments of the parties, the transcript and the legal file, and can find no error on the part of the Commission. In addition, we find that no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. Claimant’s appeal is, therefore, affirmed pursuant to rule 84.16(b). The parties have been provided with a memorandum, solely for their own information, setting out the reasons for our decision.

Sims v. Howard Motor Homes, 850 S.W.2d 437, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 578, 1993 WL 118513 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

850 S.W.2d 437 (Sims v. Howard Motor Homes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.