Sims v. Greniewicki

184 So. 2d 157, 43 Ala. App. 159, 1966 Ala. App. LEXIS 462
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 18, 1966
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 184 So. 2d 157 (Sims v. Greniewicki) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sims v. Greniewicki, 184 So. 2d 157, 43 Ala. App. 159, 1966 Ala. App. LEXIS 462 (Ala. Ct. App. 1966).

Opinions

CATES, Judge.'

This appeal was submitted December 2, 1965.

The cause of action arose September 21, 1962, and has wended its weary way into this, the third, court: ■ for the third time a judgment against Mrs. Sims for $917.56 prevails.

I.

The Facts

Mrs. Sims was nearing home in the early morning when she swerved her car to the right and collided with Mr. Greniewicki’s parked car.1 She testified that the lights of an oncoming car blinded her.

Mrs. Greniewicki and a police officer quoted Mrs. Sims as saying shortly after-wards that, among other things, her steering gear went wrong.

II.

While the res ipsa loquitur doctrine (see Cooper v. Agee, 222 Ala. 334, 132 So. 173) might suffice to affirm, we can point out other reasons also.

First, the trial judge read from Code 1940, T. 36, § 46(a), as amended. This statute — were we empowered to so hold — prescribes too vague a standard of visibility as to whether a city street light illuminates a “person or object.” Without some specification as to the size, reflectivity or luminosity of either a person (child or adult) or object, large or small, there is much to be desired. Moreover, we could take judicial notice that this statute 2 is unenforced- in cities.

Second, even if Greniewicki’s car were parked contrary to either State law or [161]*161City by-law, the efficient cause and extent of damages were questions of fact. McBride v. Baggett Transportation Co., 250 Ala. 488, 35 So.2d 101 (hn. 10).

III.

Under Code 1940, T. 13, § 66, we consider the foregoing is more than sufficient to explain our affirmance.

The judgment below is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bergman v. United States
565 F. Supp. 1353 (W.D. Michigan, 1983)
Arata v. Gustin
410 So. 2d 102 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 1982)
Todd v. United States
384 F. Supp. 1284 (M.D. Florida, 1975)
Davis v. State
220 So. 2d 852 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1968)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
184 So. 2d 157, 43 Ala. App. 159, 1966 Ala. App. LEXIS 462, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sims-v-greniewicki-alactapp-1966.