Sims v. Graham

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Sims v. Graham

123 S.E. 732, 32 Ga. App. 434, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 443

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJune 10, 1924

Docket15517

StatusPublished

This text of 123 S.E. 732 (Sims v. Graham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sims v. Graham, 123 S.E. 732, 32 Ga. App. 434, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 443 (Ga. Ct. App. 1924).

Pincite

Opinion

Bkoyles, O. J.

1. The verdict was amply authorized by the evidence, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

2. This court not being satisfied that the writ of error was prosecuted for delay only, the request of the defendant in error for the award of damages is denied.

Judgment affirmed,.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur. T. G. Farmer Jr., for plaintiff in error. Stanford Arnold, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bkoyles, O. J.

1. The verdict was amply authorized by the evidence, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

2. This court not being satisfied that the writ of error was prosecuted for delay only, the request of the defendant in error for the award of damages is denied.

Judgment affirmed,.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur. T. G. Farmer Jr., for plaintiff in error. Stanford Arnold, contra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

123 S.E. 732, 32 Ga. App. 434, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 443, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sims-v-graham-gactapp-1924.