Sims v. First National Bank

Supreme Court of Georgia

Sims v. First National Bank

134 S.E. 164, 162 Ga. 527, 1926 Ga. LEXIS 232

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided July 15, 1926·No. No. 4983·Published

Opinions

Russell, C. J.

It was error to direct a verdict in favor of the defendants, because there was evidence which would have authorized the jury to find, had the issue been submitted to them under proper instructions of the court, that a part of the debt was not used. to procure supplies for the support of the widow and minor children.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur, except Afkinson and Mines, JJ., who dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Russell, C. J.

It was error to direct a verdict in favor of the defendants, because there was evidence which would have authorized the jury to find, had the issue been submitted to them under proper instructions of the court, that a part of the debt was not used. to procure supplies for the support of the widow and minor children.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur, except Afkinson and Mines, JJ., who dissent.

Sims v. First National Bank, 134 S.E. 164, 162 Ga. 527, 1926 Ga. LEXIS 232 (Ga. 1926).

Pincite

134 S.E. 164 (Sims v. First National Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.