Sims v. Cooper

5 N.E. 726, 106 Ind. 87, 1886 Ind. LEXIS 63
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 23, 1886
DocketNo. 12,548
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 5 N.E. 726 (Sims v. Cooper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sims v. Cooper, 5 N.E. 726, 106 Ind. 87, 1886 Ind. LEXIS 63 (Ind. 1886).

Opinion

Elliott, J.

Joseph D. Sidener and 'William W. Herod recovered a judgment and a decree of foreclosure against Osy Sims and Eliza Ann Sims. On this judgment and decree the real estate was sold by the sheriff to William W. Herod, and he subsequently obtained a deed. Sometime after he secured his deed he sold and conveyed the property to the appellees, who brought this action to recover possession of it and to quiet title. On the trial, the appellants claimed to be the owners in fee, basing their claim upon an adverse possession under a tax deed, and asserting that it had continued for twenty years. There was no claim by the appellants that they were in possession as lessees; on the contrary, they denied Herod’s title, as well as that of his grantees, the appellees, and asserted that they, the appellants, were in possession as owners.

In reply to the appellants’ evidence of adverse possession, the appellees introduced in evidence a lease executed to Edith Sims, one of the appellants, by Herod, in August, 1882. The facts, of which ye have given a synopsis, are all that need be referred to, as only a single question is presented.

The contention of the appellants’ counsel is, that the finding is not supported by the evidence, because it was not shown that any demand for possession was made. This contention can not prevail. The appellants denied their landlord’s title and asserted that they were the owners of the property. They.did not claim as lessees but as owners, and, having denied their landlord’s title and asserted a title hostile to his, they were not entitled to notice to quit, nor were they in a situation to require that a demand should precede [89]*89the commencement of the action. Sedgw. & W. Trial of Title to Land, section 387.

Filed March 23, 1886.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Whitten v. Kemp
134 N.E. 211 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1922)
Barto v. Sioux City Electric Co.
93 N.W. 268 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1903)
Cargar v. Fee
39 N.E. 93 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1894)
Tobin v. Young
24 N.E. 121 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1890)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 N.E. 726, 106 Ind. 87, 1886 Ind. LEXIS 63, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sims-v-cooper-ind-1886.