Sims v. City of Atlanta

65 S.E. 841, 6 Ga. App. 802, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 478
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided October 13, 1909·No. 2130·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Powell, J.

The plaintiff in error was eonvioted in the recorder’s court of the City of Atlanta, and sought certiorari to the superior court. His petition was dismissed because the bond' was not in accordance with the act passed December 10, 1902 (Acts 1902, p. 105), the conditions of the bond as given being that the defendant should pay the eventual condemnation money and all costs. Within three months the defendant [803] gave a new bond in the terms of the statute and attempted to renew the certiorari. The judge of the superior court declined' to sanction it, and the defendant excepted. The ease is controlled by Johns v. Tifton, 122 Ga. 734 (50 S. E. 941); McDonald v. Ludowici, 3 Ga. App. 654 (60 S. E. 337); Simon v. Savannah, 4 Ga. App. 171 (60 S. E. 1036); Hill v. State, 115 Ga. 833 (42 S. E. 286); Sou. Ry. Co. v. Goodrum, 115 Ga. 689 (42 S. E. 49). Judgment affirmed.

Certiorari, from Fulton superior court — Judge Ellis. May 27, 1909. Submitted October 6, — Decided October 13, 1909. Samml D. Hewlett, for plaintiff in error. James L. May son, W. D. Ellis Jr., contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sims v. City of Atlanta, 65 S.E. 841, 6 Ga. App. 802, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 478 (Ga. Ct. App. 1909).

65 S.E. 841 (Sims v. City of Atlanta) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Toliver v. Mayor of Wrightsville
86 S.E. 823 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1915)
Scott v. City of Camilla
67 S.E. 846 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1910)