Sims v. City of Atlanta
This text of 65 S.E. 841 (Sims v. City of Atlanta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiff in error was eonvioted in the recorder’s court of the City of Atlanta, and sought certiorari to the superior court. His petition was dismissed because the bond' was not in accordance with the act passed December 10, 1902 (Acts 1902, p. 105), the conditions of the bond as given being that the defendant should pay the eventual condemnation money and all costs. Within three months the defendant [803]*803gave a new bond in the terms of the statute and attempted to renew the certiorari. The judge of the superior court declined' to sanction it, and the defendant excepted. The ease is controlled by Johns v. Tifton, 122 Ga. 734 (50 S. E. 941); McDonald v. Ludowici, 3 Ga. App. 654 (60 S. E. 337); Simon v. Savannah, 4 Ga. App. 171 (60 S. E. 1036); Hill v. State, 115 Ga. 833 (42 S. E. 286); Sou. Ry. Co. v. Goodrum, 115 Ga. 689 (42 S. E. 49). Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
65 S.E. 841, 6 Ga. App. 802, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 478, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sims-v-city-of-atlanta-gactapp-1909.