Sims v. charmes/arby's Roast Beef
Opinions
This case involves the issue of whether the filing of a Form 60 raises a presumption of continuing disability. Upon careful and detailed consideration of the facts and issues presented in this particular case, the Full Commission has determined that this case also involves several other important issues related to the plaintiff's concurrent employment. Therefore, the Full Commission believes that this case should more appropriately be reviewed by the North Carolina Court of Appeals.
Therefore, the Full Commission declines to rule enbanc on this case. The Opinion and Award of May 8, 1997, and the subsequent Order dated October 7, 1998, by the divided panel of the Full Commission shall remain in full force and effect. The time for filing any appeal to the Court of Appeals shall lie from the date of the filing of this Order.
This the ___ day of June, 1999.
S/_____________ J. HOWARD BUNN, JR. CHAIRMAN
S/_____________ BERNADINE S. BALLANCE COMMISSIONER
S/_____________ THOMAS J. BOLCH COMMISSIONER
S/_____________ LAURA K. MAVRETIC COMMISSIONER
(CONCURRING IN RESULT ONLY)
S/_____________ DIANNE C. SELLERS COMMISSIONER
(UNABLE TO PARTICIPATE IN THE DECISION DUE TO ILLNESS)
______________________________ CHRISTOPHER SCOTT COMMISSIONER
(RECUSED)
______________________________ RENEE C. RIGGSBEE COMMISSIONER
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sims v. charmes/arby's Roast Beef (Sims v. charmes/arby's Roast Beef) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.