Sims v. Briskman & Binion, P.C.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Sims v. Briskman & Binion, P.C.

670 So. 2d 863, 1995 Ala. LEXIS 424, 1995 WL 664591

Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided November 3, 1995·No. 1940565, 1940633·Published

Opinions

HOUSTON, Justice.

1940565 AFFIRMED. NO OPINION.

See Rule 53(a)(1) and (a)(2)(F), Ala. RApp.P.

MADDOX, SHORES, INGRAM, and COOK, JJ., concur. KENNEDY and BUTTS, JJ., dissent.

1940633 DISMISSED.

The cross-appeal is dismissed based on the representation of the attorneys, and this Court’s understanding, that the award of attorney fees to Briskman & Binion, P.C., will [864] be paid out of the 40% contingency fee that Betty Joyce Sims and Roger Dale Boutwell agreed to pay to the Texas law firm of O’Quinn, Kerensky & McAninch.

MADDOX, SHORES, INGRAM, COOK, and BUTTS, JJ., concur.

KENNEDY, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HOUSTON, Justice.

1940565 AFFIRMED. NO OPINION.

See Rule 53(a)(1) and (a)(2)(F), Ala. RApp.P.

MADDOX, SHORES, INGRAM, and COOK, JJ., concur. KENNEDY and BUTTS, JJ., dissent.

1940633 DISMISSED.

The cross-appeal is dismissed based on the representation of the attorneys, and this Court’s understanding, that the award of attorney fees to Briskman & Binion, P.C., will [864] be paid out of the 40% contingency fee that Betty Joyce Sims and Roger Dale Boutwell agreed to pay to the Texas law firm of O’Quinn, Kerensky & McAninch.

MADDOX, SHORES, INGRAM, COOK, and BUTTS, JJ., concur.

KENNEDY, J., dissents.

Sims v. Briskman & Binion, P.C., 670 So. 2d 863, 1995 Ala. LEXIS 424, 1995 WL 664591 (Ala. 1995).

Pincite

670 So. 2d 863 (Sims v. Briskman & Binion, P.C.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.