Sims v. Bennet
This text of 5 Ky. Op. 211 (Sims v. Bennet) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
Any equitable right which Sims may have had to subject the property of Bennet to the payment of Tatum’s debt to him grew out of the fact that Bennet was his debtor, and Bennet the debtor of Tatum.
The discharge in bankruptcy of the latter barred Sims’ right of recovery against him, and as Sims could not recover against the party immediately indebted to him, neither could he subject to the payment of the bankrupt debts dioses in action nor equitable rights the title to which by operation of law vested in his assignee. The petition was properly dismissed.
Judgment affirmed..
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
5 Ky. Op. 211, 1871 Ky. LEXIS 331, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sims-v-bennet-kyctapp-1871.