Sims v. Albemarle Corp
This text of Sims v. Albemarle Corp (Sims v. Albemarle Corp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-2022
TYRONE SIMS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
ALBEMARLE CORPORATION,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Cameron M. Currie, District Judge. (CA-01-317-5-22BD)
Submitted: March 18, 2003 Decided: April 1, 2003
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Donald Gist, THE GIST LAW FIRM, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellant. Eric C. Schweitzer, Catherine B. Templeton, OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C., Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Tyrone Sims appeals the district court’s order awarding
summary judgment to his former employer on his racial
discrimination claim under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of
1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2000). We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. See Sims v. Albemarle
Corp., No. CA-01-317-5-22BD (D.S.C. Aug. 6, 2002). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Sims v. Albemarle Corp, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sims-v-albemarle-corp-ca4-2003.