Sims-Lewis v. Willett

692 F. App'x 690
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJune 27, 2017
DocketNo. 17-6436, No. 17-6437, No. 17-6438, No. 17-6439, No. 17-6440, No. 17-6441, No. 17-6442, No. 17-6443, No. 17-6444, No. 17-6445, No. 17-6446
StatusPublished

This text of 692 F. App'x 690 (Sims-Lewis v. Willett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sims-Lewis v. Willett, 692 F. App'x 690 (4th Cir. 2017).

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Raymond Eugene Sims-Lewis seeks to appeal the district court’s orders dismissing his complaints alleging claims pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012). We dismiss the appeals for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed.

Parties are accorded 30 days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214, 127 S.Ct. 2360, 168 L.Ed.2d 96 (2007).

The district court entered its orders dismissing Sims-Lewis’ complaints between September 29, 2015 and December 4, 2015. The notice of appeal was filed on March 22, 2017.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Houston v. Lack
487 U.S. 266 (Supreme Court, 1988)
Bowles v. Russell
551 U.S. 205 (Supreme Court, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
692 F. App'x 690, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sims-lewis-v-willett-ca4-2017.