Simpson v. WORLD FINANCE CORPORATION OF SOUTH CAROLINA

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Simpson v. WORLD FINANCE CORPORATION OF SOUTH CAROLINA

644 S.E.2d 723, 373 S.C. 178, 2007 S.C. LEXIS 167

CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina

DecidedApril 23, 2007

Docket26314

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 644 S.E.2d 723 (Simpson v. WORLD FINANCE CORPORATION OF SOUTH CAROLINA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Simpson v. WORLD FINANCE CORPORATION OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 644 S.E.2d 723, 373 S.C. 178, 2007 S.C. LEXIS 167 (S.C. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

*179 PER CURIAM.

We granted a writ of certiorari to review Simpson v. World Finance Corp. of South Carolina, 367 S.C. 184, 623 S.E.2d 877 (Ct.App.2005).

We affirm the court of appeals’ decision pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authority: Aiken v. World Finance Corp. of South Carolina, Op. No. 26313, 644 S.E.2d 705 (S.C. Sup.Ct. filed April 23, 2007) (Shearouse Adv. Sh. No. 16 at 47) (holding that this Court will not interpret an arbitration agreement to apply to outrageous torts that are unforeseeable to a reasonable consumer in the context of normal business dealings).

TOAL, C.J., MOORE, WALLER, and BURNETT, JJ., concur. PLEICONES, J., concurring in result only.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*179 PER CURIAM.

We granted a writ of certiorari to review Simpson v. World Finance Corp. of South Carolina, 367 S.C. 184, 623 S.E.2d 877 (Ct.App.2005).

We affirm the court of appeals’ decision pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authority: Aiken v. World Finance Corp. of South Carolina, Op. No. 26313, 644 S.E.2d 705 (S.C. Sup.Ct. filed April 23, 2007) (Shearouse Adv. Sh. No. 16 at 47) (holding that this Court will not interpret an arbitration agreement to apply to outrageous torts that are unforeseeable to a reasonable consumer in the context of normal business dealings).

TOAL, C.J., MOORE, WALLER, and BURNETT, JJ., concur. PLEICONES, J., concurring in result only.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

644 S.E.2d 723, 373 S.C. 178, 2007 S.C. LEXIS 167, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/simpson-v-world-finance-corporation-of-south-carolina-sc-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack