Simpson v. United Parcel Service Co.
This text of 173 F. App'x 249 (Simpson v. United Parcel Service Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Debbie L. Simpson appeals a district court judgment and order adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and denying her motion for leave to file an amended complaint and dismissing her complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and affirm for the reasons of the district court. See Simpson v. United Parcel Serv. Co., No. CA-05-1500-3 (D.S.C. Nov. 22, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
173 F. App'x 249, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/simpson-v-united-parcel-service-co-ca4-2006.