Simpson v. United Parcel Service Co.

Fourth Circuit

Simpson v. United Parcel Service Co.

173 F. App'x 249

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 30, 2006·No. No. 06-1015·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Debbie L. Simpson appeals a district court judgment and order adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and denying her motion for leave to file an amended complaint and dismissing her complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and affirm for the reasons of the district court. See Simpson v. United Parcel Serv. Co., No. CA-05-1500-3 (D.S.C. Nov. 22, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Debbie L. Simpson appeals a district court judgment and order adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and denying her motion for leave to file an amended complaint and dismissing her complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and affirm for the reasons of the district court. See Simpson v. United Parcel Serv. Co., No. CA-05-1500-3 (D.S.C. Nov. 22, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Simpson v. United Parcel Service Co., 173 F. App'x 249 (4th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

173 F. App'x 249 (Simpson v. United Parcel Service Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.