Simpson v. UNION COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY

686 S.E.2d 159, 2009 WL 3602730
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided October 30, 2009·No. 109P09-4·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

686 S.E.2d 159 (2009)

David E. SIMPSON
v.
UNION COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY, State of North Carolina.

No. 109P09-4.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 30, 2009.

David Simpson, pro se.

Robert Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, Daniel P. O'Brien, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the application filed by Plaintiff on the 12th of October 2009 in this matter for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Union County:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 30th of October 2009."

Upon consideration of the application filed by Plaintiff on the 28th of October 2009 in this matter for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Union County:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 30th of October 2009."

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Simpson v. UNION COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY, 686 S.E.2d 159, 2009 WL 3602730 (N.C. 2009).

686 S.E.2d 159 (Simpson v. UNION COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Bowden
686 S.E.2d 159 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2009)