Simpson v. UNION COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY

686 S.E.2d 159, 2009 WL 3602730
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedOctober 30, 2009
Docket109P09-4
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 686 S.E.2d 159 (Simpson v. UNION COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Simpson v. UNION COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY, 686 S.E.2d 159, 2009 WL 3602730 (N.C. 2009).

Opinion

686 S.E.2d 159 (2009)

David E. SIMPSON
v.
UNION COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY, State of North Carolina.

No. 109P09-4.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 30, 2009.

David Simpson, pro se.

Robert Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, Daniel P. O'Brien, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the application filed by Plaintiff on the 12th of October 2009 in this matter for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Union County:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 30th of October 2009."

Upon consideration of the application filed by Plaintiff on the 28th of October 2009 in this matter for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Union County:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 30th of October 2009."

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Bowden
686 S.E.2d 159 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
686 S.E.2d 159, 2009 WL 3602730, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/simpson-v-union-county-district-attorney-nc-2009.