Simpson v. State

134 S.E. 328, 35 Ga. App. 592, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 1023
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided July 14, 1926·No. 17411; 17425·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Luke, J.

Alex. Simpson and Duncan Hill were, in a single indictment, charged with the offense of larceny from the house, the indictment alleging that they fraudulently and privately took and carried away 200 bushels of “short staple cottonseed.” They were tried separately, and in each case the State failed to prove that the seed alleged to have been stolen were “short staple.” This was a fatal variance. “In order to sustain a conviction of larceny the evidence must make out the description of the stolen property as laid in the indictment or accusation, although such description may have been unnecessarily minute.” McLendon v. State, 121 Ga. 158 (48 S. E. 902), and cit.; Hardy v. State, 112 Ga. 18 (37 S. E. 95).

Judgments reversed.

Broyles, Q. J., and Bloodworili, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Simpson v. State, 134 S.E. 328, 35 Ga. App. 592, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 1023 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926).

134 S.E. 328 (Simpson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Allen v. State
128 S.E.2d 549 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1962)
Smith v. State
195 S.E. 144 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1938)